Paper detail

Analogy between geodesic equation and the GCHS on Riemannian manifolds

Enlightened by the similar equation form between the GCHS \footnote{GCHS: Generalized Covariant Hamilton System\\GSPB:Generalized structural Poisson bracket} defined by the GSPB and the geodesic equation expressed by geospin variable, we find a deep connection between the geospin matrix and S-dynamics. In this contrastive way, we actually proves that the GCHS is a compatible theory suitable for the curved spacetime as primitively stated. By contrast, geospin matrix in Riemannian geometry has the same physical nature as S-dynamics in GCHS. We obtain a fact that geodesic equation can be naturally derived by the GCHS in terms of the velocity field. We strictly prove that the geometrio $\hat{S}{{\left( {{x}_{k}},{{p}_{i}},H \right)}^{T}}={{\left( {{b}_{k}},{{A}_{i}},w \right)}^{T}}$ holds by using structural operator $\hat{S}$ directly induced by structural derivative ${A}_{i}$ in terms of position ${x}_{k}$, momentum ${p}_{i}$ and Hamiltonian $H$ respectively. It evidently proves that the GCHS on the Riemannian manifold is certainly determined by the Christoffel symbols. As an application, we consider the GCHS on Riemannian geometry.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.