Paper detail

An XSPEC model to explore spectral features from black-hole sources - II. The relativistic iron line in the lamp-post geometry

In X-ray spectra of several active galactic nuclei and Galactic black hole binaries a broad relativistically smeared iron line is observed. This feature arises by fluorescence when the accretion disc is illuminated by hot corona above it. Due to central location of the corona the illumination and thus also the line emission decrease with radius. It was reported in the literature that this decrease is very steep in some of the sources, suggesting a highly compact corona. We revisit the lamp-post setup in which the corona is positioned on the axis above the rotating black hole and investigate to what extent the steep emissivity can be explained by this scenario. We show the contributions of the relativistic effects to the disc illumination by the primary source - energy shift, light bending and aberration. The lamp-post radial illumination pattern is compared to the widely used radial broken power-law emissivity profile. We find that very steep emissivities require the primary illuminating source to be positioned very near the black hole horizon and/or the spectral power-law index of the primary emission to be very high. The broken power-law approximation of the illumination can be safely used when the primary source is located at larger heights. However, for low heights the lamp-post illumination considerably differs from this approximation. We also show the variations of the iron line local flux over the disc due to the flux dependence on incident and emission angles. The former depends mainly on the height of the primary source while the latter depends on the inclination angle of the observer. Thus the strength of the line varies substantially across the disc. This effect may contribute to the observed steeper emissivity.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.