Paper detail

An XMM-Newton view of the dipping low-mass X-ray binary XTE J1710-281

(abridged) We analyzed the archived XMM-Newton observation of the poorly studied low-mass X-ray binary XTE J1710-281 performed in 2004 that covered one orbital period of the system (3.8 hr). The source shows dips as well as eclipses, hence it is viewed close to edge-on. We modeled the spectral changes between persistent and dips in the framework of the partial covering model and the ionized absorber approach. The persistent spectrum can be fit by a power law with a photon index of 1.94(+-0.02) affected by absorption from cool material with a hydrogen column density of 0.401(+-0.007)*10^22 cm^-2. The spectral changes from persistent to deep-dipping intervals are consistent with the partial covering of the power-law emission, with the covering fraction increasing from 26% during shallow dipping to 78% during deep dipping. We do not detect any absorption lines from highly ionized species such as FeXXV. The upper-limits we derive on their equivalent width (EW) are not constraining. Despite not detecting any signatures of a warm absorber, we show that the spectral changes are consistent with an increase in column density (4.3(-0.5;+0.4)*10^22 cm^-2 during shallow dipping to 11.6(-0.6;+0.4)*10^22 cm^-2 during deep dipping) and a decrease in ionization state of a highly-ionized absorber (10^2.52 during shallow dipping to 10^2.29 erg.s^-1.cm during deep dipping), associated with a slight increase in the column density of a neutral absorber. The parameters of the ionized absorber are not constrained during persistent emission. The warm absorber model better accounts for the ~1 keV depression visible in the pn dipping spectra, and naturally explains it as a blend of lines and edges unresolved by pn. A deeper observation of XTE J1710-281 would enable this interpretation to be confirmed.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

An XMM-Newton view of the dipping low-mass X-ray binary XTE J1710-281 | BZPEER | BZPEER