Paper detail

An XMM-Newton spatially-resolved study of metal abundance evolution in distant galaxy clusters

We present an XMM-Newton analysis of the X-ray spectra of 39 clusters of galaxies at 0.4<z<1.4, covering a temperature range of 1.5<=kT<=11 keV. We performed a spatially resolved spectral analysis to study how the abundance evolves with redshift not only through a single emission measure performed on the whole cluster but also spatially resolving the cluster emission. We do not observe a statistically significant (>2sigma) abundance evolution with redshift. The most significant deviation from no evolution (90% c.l.) is observed in the emission from the whole cluster (r<0.6r500), that could be parametrized as Z=A*(1+z)^(-0.8+/-0.5). Dividing the emission in 3 radial bins, no significant evidence of abundance evolution could be observed fitting the data with a power-law. A substantial agreement with measures presented in previous works is found. The error-weighted mean of the spatially resolved abundances in 3 redshift bins is consistent to be constant with z. Although the large error bars in the measure of the weighted-mean abundance prevent us from claiming any significant spatially resolved evolution, the trend with z in the 0.15-0.4r500 radial bin complements nicely the measures of Maughan et al., and broadly agrees with theoretical predictions. We also found that the data points derived from the spatially resolved analysis are well fitted by the relation Z(r,z)=Z0*(1+(r/0.15r500)^2)^(-a)*((1+z)/1.6)^(-gamma), showing a significant negative trend of Z with the radius and no significant evolution with the redshift. The present study is the first attempt made to spatially resolve the evolution of abundance with redshift. However, the sample size and the low statistics associated with most of the clusters in the sample prevents us to draw any statistically significant conclusion on the different evolutionary path that the different regions of the clusters may have traversed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.