Paper detail

An X-ray Spectral Model for Compton-Thick Toroidal Reprocessors

The central engines of both type 1 and type 2 AGNs are thought to harbor a toroidal structure that absorbs and reprocesses high-energy photons from the central X-ray source. If the reprocessor is Compton-thick, the calculation of emission-line and continuum spectra that are suitable for direct fitting to X-ray data is challenging because the reprocessed emission depends on the spectral shape of the incident continuum, which may not be directly observable. We present new Monte-Carlo calculations of Green's functions for a toroidal reprocessor that provide significant improvements over currently available models. The Green's function approach enables the construction of X-ray spectral fitting models that allow arbitrary incident spectra as part of the fitting process. The calculations are fully relativistic and have been performed for column densities that cover the Compton-thin to Compton-thick regime, for incident photon energies up to 500 keV. The reprocessed continuum and fluorescent line emission due to Fe Ka, Fe Kb, and Ni Ka are treated self-consistently, eliminating the need for ad hoc modeling that is currently common practice. We find that the spectral shape of the Compton-thick reflection spectrum in both the soft and hard X-ray bands in our toroidal geometry is different compared to that obtained from disk models. A key result of our study is that a Compton-thick toroidal structure that subtends the same solid angle at the X-ray source as a disk can produce a reflection spectrum that is ~6 times weaker than that from a disk. This highlights the widespread and erroneous interpretation of the so-called "reflection-fraction" as a solid angle, obtained from fitting disk-reflection models to Compton-thick sources without regard for proper consideration of geometry. (Abridged)

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.