Paper detail

An upper mass limit for the progenitor of the TypeII-P supernova SN1999gi

Masses and progenitor evolutionary states of TypeII supernovae remain almost unconstrained by direct observations. Only one robust observation of a progenitor (SN1987A) and one plausible observation (SN1993J) are available. Neither matched theoretical predictions and in this Letter we report limits on a third progenitor (SN1999gi). The Hubble Space Telescope has imaged the site of the TypeII-P supernova SN1999gi with the WFPC2 in two filters (F606W and F300W) prior to explosion. The distance to the host galaxy (NGC3184) of 7.9Mpc means that the most luminous, massive stars are resolved as single objects in the archive images. The supernova occurred in a resolved, young OB association 2.3kpc from the centre of NGC3184 with an association age of about 4Myrs. Follow-up images of SN1999gi with WFPC2 taken 14 months after discovery determine the precise position of the SN on the pre-explosion frames. An upper limit of the absolute magnitude of the progenitor is estimated (M_v >= -5.1). By comparison with stellar evolutionary tracks this can be interpreted as a stellar mass, and we determine an upper mass limit of 9(+3/-2)M_solar. We discuss the possibility of determining the masses or mass limits for numerous nearby core-collapse supernovae using the HST archive enhanced by our current SNAP programme.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.