Paper detail

An upper bound for the number of independent sets in regular graphs

Write ${\cal I}(G)$ for the set of independent sets of a graph $G$ and $i(G)$ for $|{\cal I}(G)|$. It has been conjectured (by Alon and Kahn) that for an $N$-vertex, $d$-regular graph $G$, $$ i(G) \leq \left(2^{d+1}-1\right)^{N/2d}. $$ If true, this bound would be tight, being achieved by the disjoint union of $N/2d$ copies of $K_{d,d}$. Kahn established the bound for bipartite $G$, and later gave an argument that established $$ i(G)\leq 2^{\frac{N}{2}\left(1+\frac{2}{d}\right)} $$ for $G$ not necessarily bipartite. In this note, we improve this to $$ i(G)\leq 2^{\frac{N}{2}\left(1+\frac{1+o(1)}{d}\right)} $$ where $o(1) \rightarrow 0$ as $d \rightarrow \infty$, which matches the conjectured upper bound in the first two terms of the exponent. We obtain this bound as a corollary of a new upper bound on the independent set polynomial $P(λ,G)=\sum_{I \in {\cal I}(G)} λ^{|I|}$ of an $N$-vertex, $d$-regular graph $G$, namely $$ P(\gl,G) \leq (1+\gl)^{\frac{N}{2}} 2^{\frac{N(1+o(1))}{2d}} $$ valid for all $\gl > 0$. This also allows us to improve the bounds obtained recently by Carroll, Galvin and Tetali on the number of independent sets of a fixed size in a regular graph.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.