Paper detail

An under-approximation for the robust uncertain two-level cooperative set covering problem

This paper investigates the robust uncertain two-level cooperative set covering problem (RUTLCSCP). Given two types of facilities, which are called y-facility and z-facility. The problem is to decide which facilities of both types to be selected, in order to cover the demand nodes cooperatively with minimal cost. It combines the concepts of robust, probabilistic, and cooperative covering by introducting "$Γ$-robust two-level-cooperative $α$-cover" constraints. Additionally, the constraint relaxed verison of the RUTLCSCP, which is also a linear approximation robust counterpart version of RUTLCSCP (RUTLCSCP-LA-RC), is developed by linear approximation of the constraints, and can be stated as a compact mixed-integer linear programming problem. We show that the solution for RUTLCSCP-LA-RC, $\varepsilon$-under-approximate solution, can also be the solution for RUTLCSCP on some conditions. Computational experiments show that the solutions in 333 instances (10125 instances in total) with 12 types which tinily violate the constraints of RUTLCSCP, can be an efficient under-approximate solutions, while the feasible solutions in other instances are proven to be optimal.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.