Paper detail

An unconditional explicit bound on the error term in the Sato-Tate conjecture

Let $f(z) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_f(n)q^n$ be a holomorphic cuspidal newform with even integral weight $k\geq 2$, level $N$, trivial nebentypus, and no complex multiplication (CM). For all primes $p$, we may define $θ_p\in [0,π]$ such that $a_f(p) = 2p^{(k-1)/2}\cos θ_p$. The Sato-Tate conjecture states that the angles $θ_p$ are equidistributed with respect to the probability measure $μ_{\textrm{ST}}(I) = \frac{2}π\int_I \sin^2 θ\; dθ$, where $I\subseteq [0,π]$. Using recent results on the automorphy of symmetric-power $L$-functions due to Newton and Thorne, we explicitly bound the error term in the Sato-Tate conjecture when $f$ corresponds to an elliptic curve over $\mathbb{Q}$ of arbitrary conductor or when $f$ has squarefree level. In these cases, if $π_{f,I}(x) := \#\{ p \leq x : p \nmid N, θ_p\in I\}$, and $π(x) := \# \{ p \leq x \}$, we prove the following bound: $$\left| \frac{π_{f,I}(x)}{π(x)} - μ_{\textrm{ST}}(I)\right| \leq 58.1\frac{\log((k-1)N \log{x})}{\sqrt{\log{x}}} \qquad \text{for} \quad x \geq 3.$$ As an application, we give an explicit bound for the number of primes up to $x$ that violate the Atkin-Serre conjecture for $f$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.