Paper detail

An $r-$process macronova/kilonova in GRB 060614: evidence for the merger of a neutron star-black hole binary

After the jet break at $t\sim 1.4$ days, the optical afterglow emission of the long-short burst GRB 060614 can be divided into two components. One is the power-law decaying forward shock afterglow emission. The other is an excess of flux in several multi-band photometric observations, which emerges at $\sim$4 days after the burst, significantly earlier than that observed for a supernova associated with a long-duration GRB. At $t>13.6$ days, the F814W-band flux drops faster than $t^{-3.2}$. Moreover, the spectrum of the excess component is very soft and the luminosity is extremely low. These observed signals are incompatible with those from weak supernovae, but the ejection of $\sim 0.1~M_\odot$ of $r-$process material from a black hole-neutron star merger, as recently found in some numerical simulations, can produce it. If this interpretation is correct, it represents the first time that a multi-epoch/band lightcurve of a Li-Paczynski macronova (also known as kilonova) has been obtained and black hole-neutron star mergers are sites of significant production of $r-$process elements.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.