Paper detail

An Overview of the SKA Science Analysis Pipeline

When completed the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will feature an unprecedented rate of image generation. While previous generations of telescopes have relied on human expertise to extract scientifically interesting information from the images, the sheer data volume of the data will now make this impractical. Additionally, the rate at which data are accrued will not allow traditional imaging products to be stored indefinitely for later inspection meaning there is a strong imperative to discard uninteresting data in pseudo-real time. Here we outline components of the SKA science analysis pipeline being developed to produce a series of data products including continuum images, spectral cubes and Faraday depth spectra. We discuss a scheme to automatically extract value from these products and discard scientifically uninteresting data. This pipeline is thus expected to give both an increase in scientific productivity, and offers the possibility of reduced data archive size producing a considerable saving.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.