Paper detail

An outlook on the estimate of the solar quadrupole moment from relativistic gravitation contributions

Of all the solar fundamental parameters (mass, diameter, gravity at the surface,...), the gravitational moments have been quite often ignored in the past, mainly due to the great difficulty to get a reliable estimate. Even though the order of magnitude of the solar quadrupole moment $J_2$ is now known to be $10^{-7}$, its accurate value is still discussed. Indeed, the expansion in multipoles $J_{(l,~ l = 2, ...)}$ of the gravitational potential of a rotating body affects the orbital motion of planets at a relativistic level. We will recall here the recent progresses made in testing General Relativity through the contribution of the first solar quadrupole moment. Using the Eddington-Robertson parameters, we recall the constraints both on a theoretical and experimental point of view. Together with $γ$, which encodes the amount of curvature of space-time per unit rest-mass, the Post--Newtonian Parameter $β$ contributes to the relativistic precession of planets. The latter parameter encodes the amount of non-linearity in the superposition law of gravitation. Even though in principle, it would be possible to extract $J_2$ from planetary ephemerides, we observe that it is significantly correlated with other solution parameters (semi-major axis of planets, mass of asteroids...). Focusing on the $J_2$ correlations, we show that in general, when ~$β$ and ~$γ$ are freed, the correlations ~[$β, J_2$] and ~[$γ, J_2$] are $\approx$ 45\% and $\approx$ 55\% respectively. Moreover, all the planetary dynamics-based values are biased by the Lense--Thiring effect, which has never been modeled and solved for so far, but can be estimated to $\approx$ 7\%. It is thus possible to get a good estimate of the solar quadrupole moment:$1.66\times10^{-7}$$\leq$$J_2$$\leq$$2.32\times10^{-7}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.