Paper detail

An outlook on event rates of induced earth quakes in the Netherlands: a preliminary analysis

The increasing rate in earth quakes in the Netherlands is attributed to the enhanced depletion of Groningen natural gas, currently at a rate of 50 billion m3 per year. We performed a model-independent analysis of the earth quake event counts in KNMI data. We find an exponential growth since 2001 with a standard deviation of 0.37% and a doubling time of 6.2 years, giving rise to one event per day in 2025. A trend in the magnitude of the quakes is indiscernible. There is no apparent sensisitivity to NAM pruduction of natural gas, which increased linearly with a standard deviation of 9.4% over the last decade. We identify the earth quakes with an avalanche triggered by a pressure drop, currently 50% away from the equilibrium pressure at the depth of 3 km. Re-establishing pressure equilibrium will proceed with an anticipated drop in soil surface up to a few meters.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.