Paper detail

An Optimized Sparse Approximate Matrix Multiply for Matrices with Decay

We present an optimized single-precision implementation of the Sparse Approximate Matrix Multiply (\SpAMM{}) [M. Challacombe and N. Bock, arXiv {\bf 1011.3534} (2010)], a fast algorithm for matrix-matrix multiplication for matrices with decay that achieves an $\mathcal{O} (n \log n)$ computational complexity with respect to matrix dimension $n$. We find that the max norm of the error achieved with a \SpAMM{} tolerance below $2 \times 10^{-8}$ is lower than that of the single-precision {\tt SGEMM} for dense quantum chemical matrices, while outperforming {\tt SGEMM} with a cross-over already for small matrices ($n \sim 1000$). Relative to naive implementations of \SpAMM{} using Intel's Math Kernel Library ({\tt MKL}) or AMD's Core Math Library ({\tt ACML}), our optimized version is found to be significantly faster. Detailed performance comparisons are made for quantum chemical matrices with differently structured sub-blocks. Finally, we discuss the potential of improved hardware prefetch to yield 2--3x speedups.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.