Paper detail

An optimized recipe for making giant bubble

Big bubbles are largely used in physics laboratories to study 2D turbulence, surface wavers, fundamental properties of soap systems... On a more artistic point of view, blowing big bubbles is part of many artistic shows. Both communities usually wan to get reasonably stable foam films. The purpose of this article is to propose the main physical ingredients allowing to identify a good recipe for making stable films and bubbles. We propose controlled experiments, to measure both the easiness to generate a bubble and its stability for different stabilizing solutions, which we choose by adding one by one the ingredients contained in an artist's recipe. The main results are that (i) the surfactant concentration must be not too high (ii) the solution must contain some long flexible polymer chains to allow an easy bubble generation and (iii) the addition of glycerol allows a better bubble stability by avoiding evaporation. We finally propose an efficient recipe, which takes into account all these considerations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.