Paper detail

An Optimized Ly$α$ Forest Inversion Tool Based on a Quantitative Comparison of Existing Reconstruction Methods

We present a same-level comparison of the most prominent inversion methods for the reconstruction of the matter density field in the quasi-linear regime from the Ly$α$ forest flux. Moreover, we present a pathway for refining the reconstruction in the framework of numerical optimization. We apply this approach to construct a novel hybrid method. The methods which are used so far for matter reconstructions are the Richardson-Lucy algorithm, an iterative Gauss-Newton method and a statistical approach assuming a one-to-one correspondence between matter and flux. We study these methods for high spectral resolutions such that thermal broadening becomes relevant. The inversion methods are compared on synthetic data (generated with the lognormal approach) with respect to their performance, accuracy, their stability against noise, and their robustness against systematic uncertainties. We conclude that the iterative Gauss-Newton method offers the most accurate reconstruction, in particular at small S/N, but has also the largest numerical complexity and requires the strongest assumptions. The other two algorithms are faster, comparably precise at small noise-levels, and, in the case of the statistical approach, more robust against inaccurate assumptions on the thermal history of the intergalactic medium (IGM). We use these results to refine the statistical approach using regularization. Our new approach has low numerical complexity and makes few assumptions about the history of the IGM, and is shown to be the most accurate reconstruction at small S/N, even if the thermal history of the IGM is not known. Our code will be made publicly available under https://github.com/hmuellergoe/reglyman.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.