Paper detail

An optimal variance estimate in stochastic homogenization of discrete elliptic equations

We consider a discrete elliptic equation on the $d$-dimensional lattice $\mathbb{Z}^d$ with random coefficients $A$ of the simplest type: they are identically distributed and independent from edge to edge. On scales large w.r.t. the lattice spacing (i.e., unity), the solution operator is known to behave like the solution operator of a (continuous) elliptic equation with constant deterministic coefficients. This symmetric ``homogenized'' matrix $A_{\mathrm {hom}}=a_{\mathrm {hom}}\operatorname {Id}$ is characterized by $ξ\cdot A_{\mathrm {hom}}ξ=\langle(ξ+\nablaϕ)\cdot A(ξ+\nablaϕ)\rangle$ for any direction $ξ\in\mathbb {R}^d$, where the random field $ϕ$ (the ``corrector'') is the unique solution of $-\nabla^*\cdot A(ξ+\nablaϕ)=0$ such that $ϕ(0)=0$, $\nablaϕ$ is stationary and $\langle\nablaϕ\rangle=0$, $\langle\cdot\rangle$ denoting the ensemble average (or expectation). It is known (``by ergodicity'') that the above ensemble average of the energy density $\mathcal {E}=(ξ+\nablaϕ)\cdot A(ξ+\nablaϕ)$, which is a stationary random field, can be recovered by a system average. We quantify this by proving that the variance of a spatial average of $\mathcal {E}$ on length scales $L$ satisfies the optimal estimate, that is, $\operatorname {var}[\sum \mathcal {E}η_L]\lesssim L^{-d}$, where the averaging function [i.e., $\sumη_L=1$, $\operatorname {supp}(η_L)\subset\{|x|\le L\}$] has to be smooth in the sense that $|\nablaη_L|\lesssim L^{-1-d}$. In two space dimensions (i.e., $d=2$), there is a logarithmic correction. This estimate is optimal since it shows that smooth averages of the energy density $\mathcal {E}$ decay in $L$ as if $\mathcal {E}$ would be independent from edge to edge (which it is not for $d>1$). This result is of practical significance, since it allows to estimate the dominant error when numerically computing $a_{\mathrm {hom}}$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.