Paper detail

An Optimal Randomized Online Algorithm for Reordering Buffer Management

We give an $O(\log\log k)$-competitive randomized online algorithm for reordering buffer management, where $k$ is the buffer size. Our bound matches the lower bound of Adamaszek et al. (STOC 2011). Our algorithm has two stages which are executed online in parallel. The first stage computes deterministically a feasible fractional solution to an LP relaxation for reordering buffer management. The second stage "rounds" using randomness the fractional solution. The first stage is based on the online primal-dual schema, combined with a dual fitting argument. As multiplicative weights steps and dual fitting steps are interleaved and in some sense conflicting, combining them is challenging. We also note that we apply the primal-dual schema to a relaxation with mixed packing and covering constraints. We pay the $O(\log\log k)$ competitive factor for the gap between the computed LP solution and the optimal LP solution. The second stage gives an online algorithm that converts the LP solution to an integral solution, while increasing the cost by an O(1) factor. This stage generalizes recent results that gave a similar approximation factor for rounding the LP solution, albeit using an offline rounding algorithm.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.