Paper detail

An Oort cloud origin of the Halley-type comets

The origin of the Halley-type comets (HTCs) is one of the last mysteries of the dynamical evolution of the Solar System. Prior investigation into their origin has focused on two source regions: the Oort cloud and the Scattered Disc. From the former it has been difficult to reproduce the non-isotropic, prograde skew in the inclination distribution of the observed HTCs without invoking a multi-component Oort cloud model and specific fading of the comets. The Scattered Disc origin fares better but suffers from needing an order of magnitude more mass than is currently advocated by theory and observations. Here we revisit the Oort cloud origin and include cometary fading. Our observational sample stems from the JPL catalogue. We only keep comets discovered and observed after 1950 but place no a priori restriction on the maximum perihelion distance of observational completeness. We then numerically evolve half a million comets from the Oort cloud through the realm of the giant planets and keep track of their number of perihelion passages with perihelion distance q<2.5AU, below which the activity is supposed to increase considerably. We can simultaneously fit the HTC inclination and semi-major axis distribution very well with a power law fading function of the form m^-k, where m is the number of perihelion passages with q<2.5 AU and k is the fading index. We match both the inclination and semi-major axis distributions when k~1 and the maximum imposed perihelion distance of the observed sample is q~1.8AU. The value of k is higher than the one obtained for the Long-Period Comets (LPCs), with k~0.7. This increase in k is most likely the result of cometary surface processes. We argue the HTC sample is now most likely complete for q<1.8AU. We calculate that the steady-state number of active HTCs with diameter D>2.3km and q<1.8AU is of the order of 100.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.