Paper detail

An Off-Axis Relativistic Jet Model for the Type Ic supernova SN 2007gr

We propose an off-axis relativistic jet model for the Type Ic supernova SN 2007gr. Most of the energy ($\sim2\times10^{51}$ erg) in the explosion is contained in non-relativistic ejecta which produces the supernova. The optical emission is coming from the decay process of $\rm ^{56}Ni$ synthesized in the bulk SN ejecta. Only very little energy ($\sim10^{48}$ erg) is contained in the relativistic jet with initial velocity about 0.94 times the speed of light. The radio and X-ray emission comes from this relativistic jet. With some typical parameters of a Wolf-Rayet star (progenitor of Type Ic SN), i.e., the mass loss rate $\dot{M}=1.0 \times10^{-5} M_{\odot} \rm yr^{-1}$ and the wind velocity $v_{\rm w}=1.5\times10^{3} \rm km s^{-1}$ together with an observing angle of $θ_{\rm obs} = 63.3^{\circ}$, we can obtain the multiband light curves that fit the observations well. All the observed data are consistent with our model. Thus we conclude that SN 2007gr contains a weak relativistic jet and we are observing the jet from off-axis.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.