Paper detail

An Observed Link between Active Galactic Nuclei and Violent Disk Instabilities in High-Redshift Galaxies

We provide evidence for a correlation between the presence of giant clumps and the occurrence of active galactic nuclei (AGN) in disk galaxies. Giant clumps of 10^8-9 Msun arise from violent gravitational instability in gas-rich galaxies, and it has been proposed that this instability could feed supermassive black holes (BH). We use emission line diagnostics to compare a sample of 14 clumpy (unstable) disks and a sample of 13 smoother (stable) disks at redshift z~0.7. The majority of clumpy disks in our sample have a high probability of containing AGN. Their [OIII] emission line is strongly excited, inconsistent with low-metallicity star formation alone. [NeIII] excitation is also higher. Stable disks rarely have such properties. Stacking ultra sensitive Chandra observations (4 Ms) reveals an X-ray excess in clumpy galaxies, which cannot be solely due to star formation and confirms the presence of AGN. The clumpy galaxies in our intermediate-redshift sample have properties typical of gas-rich disk galaxies rather than mergers, being in particular on the Main Sequence of star formation. This suggests that our findings apply to the physically-similar and numerous gas-rich unstable disks at z>1. Using the observed [OIII] and X-ray luminosities, we conservatively estimate that AGN hosted by clumpy disks have typical bolometric luminosities of the order of a few 10^43 erg/s, BH growth rates ~10^-2 Msun/yr, and that these AGN are substantially obscured in X-rays. This moderate-luminosity mode could be sufficient to provide a large fraction of today's BH mass over a couple of Gyr given that our observations suggest a high duty cycle (>10%), accretion bursts with higher luminosities being possible over shorter phases. The observed evolution of disk instabilities with mass and redshift could explain the simultaneous downsizing of star formation and of BH growth.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.