Paper detail

An observable electron-positron anisotropy cannot be generated by dark matter

I demonstrate that if an anisotropy in the arrival direction of high-energy cosmic-ray electrons and positrons is observed then, barring local anisotropic diffusion, dark matter annihilation is ruled out as an explanation to the positron excess. For an observable anisotropy to originate from dark matter annihilation, the high-energy electrons and positrons must be produced in a nearby clump. I consider the annihilation pathway producing the smallest flux of gamma rays versus electrons and positrons, and the combination of clump distance and luminosity that minimizes the gamma-ray flux. I show that if an anisotropy from such a clump were detected, and if such anisotropy did not generate from anisotropic diffusion effects, then the clump would be clearly detectable as an anomalous, bright gamma-ray source with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. I also point out that the non-detection of an anisotropy is perfectly compatible with an astrophysical origin for the excess positrons that has nothing to do with dark matter.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.