Paper detail

An O2If* star found in isolation in the backyard of NGC 3603

In this letter we communicate the identification of a new Galactic O2If* star (MTT 68) isolated at a projected linear distance of 3 pc from the centre of the star-burst cluster NGC 3603. From its optical photometry I computed a bolometric luminosity M_Bol = -10.7, which corresponds to a total stellar luminosity of 1.5 x 10^{6} L_Sun. It was found an interesting similarity between MTT 68 and the well known multiple system HD 93129. From Hubble Space Telescope F656N images of the NGC 3603 field, it was found that MTT 68 is actually a visual binary system with an angular separation of 0.38 arcsec, which corresponds to a projected (minimum) linear distance of r_(A-B) = 1.4 x 10^{-2} pc. This value is similar to that for the HD 93129A (O2If*) and HD 93129B (O3.5) pair, r_(A-B) = 3.0 x 10^{-2} pc. On the other hand, HD93129A has a third closer companion named HD 93129Ab (O3.5) at only 0.053 arcsec, and taking into account that the X-ray to total stellar luminosity ratio for the MTT 68 system (L_X/L_Bol 10^{-5}) is about two orders of magnitude above the canonical value expected for single stars, I suspect that the MTT 68 system probably hosts another massive companion not resolved by the HST archive images.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.