Paper detail

An irradiated brown-dwarf companion to an accreting white dwarf

Brown dwarfs and giant planets orbiting close to a host star are subjected to significant irradiation that can modify the properties of their atmospheres. In order to test the atmospheric models that are used to describe these systems, it is necessary to obtain accurate observational estimates of their physical properties (masses, radii, temperatures, albedos). Interacting compact binary systems provide a natural laboratory for studying strongly irradiated sub-stellar objects. As the mass-losing secondary in these systems makes a critical, but poorly understood transition from the stellar to the sub-stellar regime, it is also strongly irradiated by the compact accretor. In fact, the internal and external energy fluxes are both expected to be comparable in these objects, providing access to an unexplored irradiation regime. However, the atmospheric properties of such donors have so far remained largely unknown. Here, we report the direct spectroscopic detection and characterisation of an irradiated sub-stellar donor in an accreting white dwarf binary system. Our near-infrared observations allow us to determine a model-independent mass estimate for the donor of $M_2=0.055\pm0.008M_{\odot}$ and an average spectral type of ${\rm L1}\pm{\rm1}$, supporting both theoretical predictions and model-dependent observational constraints. Our time-resolved data also allow us to estimate the average irradiation-induced temperature difference between the day and night sides on the sub-stellar donor, $Δ{\rm T}\simeq57$~K, and the maximum difference between the hottest and coolest parts of its surface, of $Δ{\rm T}_{max}\simeq200$~K. The observations are well described by a simple geometric reprocessing model with a bolometric (Bond) albedo of $A_B<0.54$ at 2-$σ$ confidence level, consistent with high reprocessing efficiency, but poor lateral heat redistribution in the donor's atmosphere.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.