Paper detail

An investigation into the prominence of spiral galaxy bulges

From a diameter-limited sample of 86 `face-on' spiral galaxies, the bulge-to-disk size and luminosity ratios, and other quantitative measurements for the prominence of the bulge are derived. The bulge and disk parameters have been estimated using a seeing convolved Sersic r^(1/n) bulge and a seeing convolved exponential disk. In general, early-type spiral galaxy bulges have Sersic values of n>1, and late-type spiral galaxy bulges have values of n<1. In the B-band, only 8 galaxies have a bulge shape parameter n consistent with the exponential value of 1, and only 5 galaxies do in the K-band. Application of the r^(1/n) bulge models results in a larger mean r_e/h ratio for the early-type spiral galaxies than the late-type spiral galaxies. Although, this result is shown not to be statistically significant. The mean B/D luminosity ratio is, however, significantly larger (> 3-sigma) for the early-type spirals than the late-type spirals. This apparent contradiction with the r_e/h values can be explained with an iceberg-like scenario, in which the bulges in late-type spiral galaxies are relatively submerged in their disk. This can be achieved by varying the relative bulge/disk stellar density while maintaining the same effective bulge-to-disk size ratio. The absolute bulge magnitude - log(n) diagram is used as a diagnostic tool for comparative studies with dwarf elliptical and ordinary elliptical galaxies. At least in the B-band, these objects occupy distinctly different regions of this parameter space. While the dwarf ellipticals appear to be the faint extension to the brighter elliptical galaxies, the bulges of spiral galaxies are not.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.