Paper detail

An Inverse Problem Approach for Content Popularity Estimation

The Internet increasingly focuses on content, as exemplified by the now popular Information Centric Networking paradigm. This means, in particular, that estimating content popularities becomes essential to manage and distribute content pieces efficiently. In this paper, we show how to properly estimate content popularities from a traffic trace. Specifically, we consider the problem of the popularity inference in order to tune content-level performance models, e.g. caching models. In this context, special care must be brought on the fact that an observer measures only the flow of requests, which differs from the model parameters, though both quantities are related by the model assumptions. Current studies, however, ignore this difference and use the observed data as model parameters. In this paper, we highlight the inverse problem that consists in determining parameters so that the flow of requests is properly predicted by the model. We then show how such an inverse problem can be solved using Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Based on two large traces from the Orange network and two synthetic datasets, we eventually quantify the importance of this inversion step for the performance evaluation accuracy.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.