Paper detail

An Invariant of Algebraic Curves from the Pascal Theorem

In 1640's, Blaise Pascal discovered a remarkable property of a hexagon inscribed in a conic - Pascal Theorem, which gave birth of the projective geometry. In this paper, a new geometric invariant of algebraic curves is discovered by a different comprehension to Pascal's mystic hexagram or to the Pascal theorem. Using this invariant, the Pascal theorem can be generalized to the case of cubic (even to algebraic curves of higher degree), that is, {\em For any given 9 intersections between a cubic $Γ_3$ and any three lines $a,b,c$ with no common zero, none of them is a component of $Γ_3$, then the six points consisting of the three points determined by the Pascal mapping applied to any six points (no three points of which are collinear) among those 9 intersections as well as the remaining three points of those 9 intersections must lie on a conic.} This generalization differs quite a bit and is much simpler than Chasles's theorem and Cayley-Bacharach theorems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.