Paper detail

An Interior model of Charged Fluid Spheres

At constant time $t$, we examine the Vaidya-Tikekar metric characterising a three-dimensional, extremely dense spheroidal star configuration. The static, spherically symmetric solution of Einstein's field equations can be expressed in analytic closed form utilising a hypergeometric series. A relativistic, superdense state of matter at a constant $t$ is represented by the resultant model, which describes the geometry of a three-spheroid. Assuming a stellar density of $ρ_{a}= 2*10^{14} gm*cm^{-3}$, we investigate configurations whose total mass and radius vary over a range of well-defined values of the density variation parameter. Similar to an uncharged neutron star, all models possess the same total mass and boundary radius. The hypergeometric solution leads to a new class of exact, physically acceptable solutions. We show that the model satisfies the conditions of hydrostatic equilibrium and fulfils all standard energy conditions, which are verified throughout the analysis.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.