Paper detail

An integer programming approach for solving a generalized version of the Grundy domination number

A sequence of vertices in a graph is called a legal dominating sequence if every vertex in the sequence dominates at least one vertex not dominated by those that precede it, and at the end all vertices of the graph are dominated. The Grundy domination number of a graph is the size of a largest legal dominating sequence. In this work, we introduce a generalized version of the Grundy domination problem. We explicitly calculate the corresponding parameter for paths and web graphs. We propose integer programming formulations for the new problem, find families of valid inequalities and perform extensive computational experiments to compare the formulations as well as to test these inequalities as cuts in a branch-and-cut framework. We also design and evaluate the performance of a heuristic for finding good initial lower and upper bounds and a tabu search that improves the initial lower bound. The test instances include randomly generated graphs, structured graphs, classical benchmark instances and two instances from a real application. Our approach is exact for graphs with 20-50 vertices and provides good solutions for graphs up to 10000 vertices.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.