Paper detail

An Initial Mass Function for Individual Stars in Galactic Disks: I. Constraining the Shape of the IMF

We derive a semi-empirical galactic initial mass function (IMF) from observational constraints. We assume that the star formation rate in a galaxy can be expressed as the product of the IMF, $ψ(m)$, which is a smooth function of mass $m$ (in units of \msun), and a time- and space-dependent total rate of star formation per unit area of galactic disk. The mass dependence of the proposed IMF is determined by five parameters: the low-mass slope $γ$, the high-mass slope $-Γ$, the characteristic mass $m_{ch}$ (which is close to the mass $m_{\rm peak}$ at which the IMF turns over), and the lower and upper limits on the mass, $m_l$ (taken to be 0.004) and $m_u$ (taken to be 120). The star formation rate in terms of number of stars per unit area of galactic disk per unit logarithmic mass interval, is proportional to $m^{-Γ} \left\{1-\exp\left[{-(m/m_{ch})^{γ+Γ}}\right]\right\}$, where $\cal N_*$ is the number of stars, $m_l<m<m_u$ is the range of stellar masses. The values of $γ$ and $\emch$ are derived from two integral constraints: i) the ratio of the number density of stars in the range $m=0.1-0.6$ to that in the range $m=0.6-0.8$ as inferred from the mass distribution of field stars in the local neighborhood, and ii) the ratio of the number of stars in the range $m=0.08 - 1$ to the number of brown dwarfs in the range $m=0.03-0.08$ in young clusters. The IMF satisfying the above constraints is characterized by the parameters $γ=0.51$ and $\emch=0.35$ (which corresponds to $m_{\rm peak}=0.27$). This IMF agrees quite well with the Chabrier (2005) IMF for the entire mass range over which we have compared with data, but predicts significantly more stars with masses $< 0.03\, M_\odot$; we also compare with other IMFs in current use.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.