Paper detail

An inexact infeasible arc-search interior-point method for linear optimization problems

We propose an inexact infeasible arc-search interior-point method for solving linear optimization problems. The method combines an arc-search strategy with inexact solutions to Newton systems and admits a polynomial iteration complexity bound. In existing inexact infeasible interior-point methods, both the linearization error of the central path and the inexactness of the Newton system accumulate along the search direction, which forces the algorithm to take very small steps. The proposed method mitigates this effect by using an arc-search strategy: the curved search path provides a more accurate approximation of the central path, so the step size can remain larger even when the Newton system is solved inexactly. As a result, the proposed method achieves a provably tighter worst-case iteration bound than existing inexact infeasible line-search methods. Numerical experiments on NETLIB benchmark problems demonstrate that the proposed method reduces both the number of iterations and the computation time.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.