Paper detail

An inequality for the distance between densities of free convolutions

This paper contributes to the study of the free additive convolution of probability measures. It shows that under some conditions, if measures $μ_i$ and $ν_i, i=1,2$, are close to each other in terms of the Lévy metric and if the free convolution $μ_1\boxplusμ_2$ is sufficiently smooth, then $ν_1\boxplusν_2$ is absolutely continuous, and the densities of measures $ν_1\boxplusν_2$ and $μ_1\boxplusμ_2$ are close to each other. In particular, convergence in distribution $μ_1^{(n)}\rightarrow μ_1,$ $μ_2^{(n)}\rightarrowμ_2$ implies that the density of $μ_1^{(n)}\boxplusμ_2^{(n)}$ is defined for all sufficiently large $n$ and converges to the density of $μ_1\boxplusμ_2$. Some applications are provided, including: (i) a new proof of the local version of the free central limit theorem, and (ii) new local limit theorems for sums of free projections, for sums of $\boxplus$-stable random variables and for eigenvalues of a sum of two $N$-by-$N$ random matrices.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.