Paper detail

An Independent Planet Search In The Kepler Dataset. I. A hundred new candidates and revised KOIs

Aims. We present our re-analyze the Kepler photometric dataset, searching for planetary transits using an alternative processing pipeline to the one used by the Kepler Mission. Methods. The SARS pipeline was tested extensively by processing all available CoRoT data. We used this pipeline to search for (additional) planetary transits only in the Kepler objects of interest (KOIs). Results. Although less than 1% of the Kepler dataset are KOIs we are able to significantly update the overall statistics of planetary multiplicity: we find 84 new transit signals on 64 systems on these light curves only, nearly doubling the number of transit signals in these systems. Forty-one of the systems were singly-transiting systems that are now multiply-transiting. Notable among the new discoveries are KOI 435 as a new six-candidate system (of which kind only Kepler-11 was known before), KOI 277 (which includes two candidates in a 6:7 resonance and anti-correlated transit timing variations) - all but validating the system, KOIs 719, 1574, and 1871 that have small planet candidates (1.15, 2.05 and 1.71R_Earth) in the habitable zone of their host star, and KOI 1843 that exhibits the shortest period (4.25hr) and among the smallest (0.63 R_Earth) of all planet candidates. We are also able to reject 11 KOIs as eclipsing binaries, update the ephemeris for five KOIs and otherwise discuss yet other objects. Interestingly, about 1/3 of the newly detected candidates participate in period commensurabilities. Finally, we discuss the possible overestimation of parameter errors in the current list of KOIs. Conclusions. Our results strengthen previous analyses of the multi-transiting ensemble. Nevertheless, we conclude that despite the phenomenal success of the Kepler mission, parallel analysis of the data by multiple teams is required to make full use of the data. [ABRIDGED]

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.