Paper detail

An Independent Analysis of Kepler-4b through Kepler-8b

We present two independent, homogeneous, global analyses of the transit light curves, radial velocities and spectroscopy of Kepler-4b through Kepler-8b, with numerous differences over the previous methods. These include: 1) improved decorrelated parameter fitting set, 2) new limb darkening coefficients, 3) time-stamps modified to BJD for consistency with RV, 4) two different methods for compensating for the integration-time of Kepler LC-data, 5) best-fit secondary-eclipse depths and excluded upper limits, 6) fitted mid-transit times, durations, depths and baseline fluxes for individual transits. We make several new determinations: 1) We detect a secondary eclipse for Kepler-7b of depth (47+/-14)ppm and significance 3.5-sigma. We conclude reflected light is a more plausible origin than thermal emission and determine a geometric albedo of Ag=(0.38+/-0.12). 2) An eccentric-orbit model for the Neptune-mass planet Kepler-4b is marginally detected to 2-sigma confidence with e=(0.25+/-0.12). If confirmed, this would place Kepler-4b in a similar category as GJ436b and HAT-P-11b as an eccentric, Neptune-mass planet. 3) We find marginal (2-sigma) evidence for Kepler-5b's secondary eclipse of depth (26+/-17)ppm. The most plausible explanation is reflected light caused by a planet with Ag=(0.15+/-0.10). 4) A 2.6-sigma peak in Kepler-6b TTV periodogram is detected and is not easily explained as an aliased frequency. We find that a resonant/non-resonant perturber, Trojan or exomoon all provide inadequate explanations and the most likely source is stellar rotation. 5) We find different impact parameters relative to the discovery papers in most cases, but generally self-consistent. 6) We constrain the presence of resonant planets, exomoons and Trojans using transit timing.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.