Paper detail

An improvement to the volcano-scan algorithm for atmospheric correction of CRISM and OMEGA spectral data

The observations of Mars by the CRISM and OMEGA hyperspectral imaging spectrometers require correction for photometric, atmospheric and thermal effects prior to the interpretation of possible mineralogical features in the spectra. Here, we report on a simple, yet non-trivial, adaptation to the commonly-used volcano-scan correction technique for atmospheric CO_2, which allows for the improved detection of minerals with intrinsic absorption bands at wavelengths between 1.9-2.1 $μ$m. This volcano-scan technique removes the absorption bands of CO_2 by ensuring that the Lambert albedo is the same at two wavelengths: 1.890 $μ$m and 2.011 $μ$m, with the first wavelength outside the CO_2 gas bands and the second wavelength deep inside the CO_2 gas bands. Our adaptation to the volcano-scan technique moves the first wavelength from 1.890 $μ$m to be instead within the gas bands at 1.980 $μ$m, and for CRISM data, our adaptation shifts the second wavelength slightly, to 2.007 $μ$m. We also report on our efforts to account for a slight ~0.001 $μ$m shift in wavelengths due to thermal effects in the CRISM instrument.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.