Paper detail

An improved version of the Implicit Integral Method to solving radiative transfer problems

Radiative transfer (RT) problems in which the source function includes a scattering-like integral are typical two-points boundary problems. Their solution via differential equations implies to make hypotheses on the solution itself, namely the specific intensity I(tau;n) of the radiation field. On the contrary, integral methods require to make hypotheses on the source function S(tau). It looks of course more reasonable to make hypotheses on the latter because one can expect that the run of S(tau) with depth be smoother than that of I(tau;n). In previous works we assumed a piece-wise parabolic approximation for the source function, which warrants the continuity of S(tau) and its first derivative at each depth point. Here we impose the continuity of the second derivative S"(tau). In other words, we adopt a cubic spline representation to the source function, which highly stabilize the numerical processes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.