Paper detail

An Improved Long-Time Bishop-Gromov Theorem Using Shear

The Bishop-Gromov theorem is a comparison theorem of differential geometry that upperbounds the growth of volume of a geodesic ball in a curved space. For many spaces, this bound is far from tight. We identify a major reason the bound fails to be tight: it neglects the effect of shear. By using higher curvature invariants to lowerbound the average shear, we are able to place tighter-than-Bishop-Gromov upperbounds on the late-time growth rates of geodesic balls in homogeneous spaces with non-positive sectional curvature. We also provide concrete guidance on how our theorem can be generalized to inhomogeneous spaces, to spaces with positive sectional curvatures, and to intermediate and short times. In arXiv:2209.09288 we discovered an enhancement to the BG theorem that was strongest at early times, and that relied upon additive properties of families of Jacobi equations; in this paper we find a different enhancement at late times that connects to multiplicative properties of families of Jacobi equations. A novel feature shared by both papers is the consideration of families of equations that are not coupled but whose coefficients are correlated.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.