Paper detail

An improved design of an inductive fault current limiter based on a superconducting cylinder

The paper deals with basic designs of a fault current limiter of the transformer type which differ each other by the mutual location of a primary winding and a superconducting short-circuited cylinder. Theoretical study of the main parameters of the different designs is performed in the framework of the critical state model and shows that the most effective is a design in which the primary winding is divided to two sections with equal turn numbers. The sections are placed inside and outside of the cylinder and connected in series. Such arrangement of the windings leads to a substantial reduction of AC losses in the superconducting cylinder, an increase of the activation current and a decrease of the inductive reactance in the normal regime of a protected circuit. The experimental results obtained on the laboratory model with a BSSCO cylinder confirm the theoretical predictions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.