Paper detail

An improved bound on the fraction of correctable deletions

We consider codes over fixed alphabets against worst-case symbol deletions. For any fixed $k \ge 2$, we construct a family of codes over alphabet of size $k$ with positive rate, which allow efficient recovery from a worst-case deletion fraction approaching $1-\frac{2}{k+\sqrt k}$. In particular, for binary codes, we are able to recover a fraction of deletions approaching $1/(\sqrt 2 +1)=\sqrt 2-1 \approx 0.414$. Previously, even non-constructively the largest deletion fraction known to be correctable with positive rate was $1-Θ(1/\sqrt{k})$, and around $0.17$ for the binary case. Our result pins down the largest fraction of correctable deletions for $k$-ary codes as $1-Θ(1/k)$, since $1-1/k$ is an upper bound even for the simpler model of erasures where the locations of the missing symbols are known. Closing the gap between $(\sqrt 2 -1)$ and $1/2$ for the limit of worst-case deletions correctable by binary codes remains a tantalizing open question.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.