Paper detail

An Improved Approximation for $k$-median, and Positive Correlation in Budgeted Optimization

Dependent rounding is a useful technique for optimization problems with hard budget constraints. This framework naturally leads to \emph{negative correlation} properties. However, what if an application naturally calls for dependent rounding on the one hand, and desires \emph{positive} correlation on the other? More generally, we develop algorithms that guarantee the known properties of dependent rounding, but also have nearly best-possible behavior - near-independence, which generalizes positive correlation - on "small" subsets of the variables. The recent breakthrough of Li & Svensson for the classical $k$-median problem has to handle positive correlation in certain dependent-rounding settings, and does so implicitly. We improve upon Li-Svensson's approximation ratio for $k$-median from $2.732 + ε$ to $2.675 + ε$ by developing an algorithm that improves upon various aspects of their work. Our dependent-rounding approach helps us improve the dependence of the runtime on the parameter $ε$ from Li-Svensson's $N^{O(1/ε^2)}$ to $N^{O((1/ε) \log(1/ε))}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.