Paper detail

An Improved Approximation Algorithm for the Column Subset Selection Problem

We consider the problem of selecting the best subset of exactly $k$ columns from an $m \times n$ matrix $A$. We present and analyze a novel two-stage algorithm that runs in $O(\min\{mn^2,m^2n\})$ time and returns as output an $m \times k$ matrix $C$ consisting of exactly $k$ columns of $A$. In the first (randomized) stage, the algorithm randomly selects $Θ(k \log k)$ columns according to a judiciously-chosen probability distribution that depends on information in the top-$k$ right singular subspace of $A$. In the second (deterministic) stage, the algorithm applies a deterministic column-selection procedure to select and return exactly $k$ columns from the set of columns selected in the first stage. Let $C$ be the $m \times k$ matrix containing those $k$ columns, let $P_C$ denote the projection matrix onto the span of those columns, and let $A_k$ denote the best rank-$k$ approximation to the matrix $A$. Then, we prove that, with probability at least 0.8, $$ \FNorm{A - P_CA} \leq Θ(k \log^{1/2} k) \FNorm{A-A_k}. $$ This Frobenius norm bound is only a factor of $\sqrt{k \log k}$ worse than the best previously existing existential result and is roughly $O(\sqrt{k!})$ better than the best previous algorithmic result for the Frobenius norm version of this Column Subset Selection Problem (CSSP). We also prove that, with probability at least 0.8, $$ \TNorm{A - P_CA} \leq Θ(k \log^{1/2} k)\TNorm{A-A_k} + Θ(k^{3/4}\log^{1/4}k)\FNorm{A-A_k}. $$ This spectral norm bound is not directly comparable to the best previously existing bounds for the spectral norm version of this CSSP. Our bound depends on $\FNorm{A-A_k}$, whereas previous results depend on $\sqrt{n-k}\TNorm{A-A_k}$; if these two quantities are comparable, then our bound is asymptotically worse by a $(k \log k)^{1/4}$ factor.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.