Paper detail

An improved analysis of the Mömke-Svensson algorithm for graph-TSP on subquartic graphs

Mömke and Svensson presented a beautiful new approach for the traveling salesman problem on a graph metric (graph-TSP), which yields a $4/3$-approximation guarantee on subcubic graphs as well as a substantial improvement over the $3/2$-approximation guarantee of Christofides' algorithm on general graphs. The crux of their approach is to compute an upper bound on the minimum cost of a circulation in a particular network, $C(G,T)$, where $G$ is the input graph and $T$ is a carefully chosen spanning tree. The cost of this circulation is directly related to the number of edges in a tour output by their algorithm. Mucha subsequently improved the analysis of the circulation cost, proving that Mömke and Svensson's algorithm for graph-TSP has an approximation ratio of at most $13/9$ on general graphs. This analysis of the circulation is local, and vertices with degree four and five can contribute the most to its cost. Thus, hypothetically, there could exist a subquartic graph (a graph with degree at most four at each vertex) for which Mucha's analysis of the Mömke-Svensson algorithm is tight. We show that this is not the case and that Mömke and Svensson's algorithm for graph-TSP has an approximation guarantee of at most $25/18$ on subquartic graphs. To prove this, we present different methods to upper bound the minimum cost of a circulation on the network $C(G,T)$. Our approximation guarantee holds for all graphs that have an optimal solution to a standard linear programming relaxation of graph-TSP with subquartic support.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.