Paper detail

An Improved Analysis of LP-based Control for Revenue Management

In this paper, we study a class of revenue management problems where the decision maker aims to maximize the total revenue subject to budget constraints on multiple type of resources over a finite horizon. At each time, a new order/customer/bid is revealed with a request of some resource(s) and a reward, and the decision maker needs to either accept or reject the order. Upon the acceptance of the order, the resource request must be satisfied and the associated revenue (reward) can be collected. We consider a stochastic setting where all the orders are i.i.d. sampled, i.e., the reward-request pair at each time is drawn from an unknown distribution with finite support. The formulation contains many classic applications such as the quantity-based network revenue management problem and the Adwords problem. We focus on the classic LP-based adaptive algorithm and consider regret as the performance measure defined by the gap between the optimal objective value of the certainty-equivalent linear program (LP) and the expected revenue obtained by the online algorithm. Our contribution is two-fold: (i) when the underlying LP is nondegenerate, the algorithm achieves a problem-dependent regret upper bound that is independent of the horizon/number of time periods $T$; (ii) when the underlying LP is degenerate, the algorithm achieves a regret upper bound that scales on the order of $\sqrt{T}\log T$. To our knowledge, both results are new and improve the best existing bounds for the LP-based adaptive algorithm in the corresponding setting. We conclude with numerical experiments to further demonstrate our findings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.