Paper detail

An Imprint of the Galactic Magnetic Field in the Diffuse Unpolarized Dust Emission

It is well known that aligned, aspherical dust grains emit polarized radiation and that the degree of polarization depends on the angle $ψ$ between the interstellar magnetic field and the line of sight. However, anisotropy of the dust absorption cross sections also modulates the $total\ intensity$ of the radiation as the viewing geometry changes. We report a detection of this effect in the high Galactic latitude $Planck$ data, finding that the 353 GHz dust intensity per $N_{\rm HI}$ is smaller when the Galactic magnetic field is mostly in the plane of the sky and larger when the field is mostly along the line of sight. These variations are of opposite sign and roughly equal magnitude as the changes in polarized intensity per $N_{\rm HI}$ with $ψ$, as predicted. In principle, the variation in intensity can be used in conjunction with the dust polarization angle to constrain the full 3D orientation of the Galactic magnetic field.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.