Paper detail

AN IMAGING K-BAND SURVEY - II: THE REDSHIFT SURVEY AND GALAXY EVOLUTION IN THE INFRARED

We present a redshift survey of 124 galaxies, from an imaging $K$-band survey complete to $K\simeq 17.3$. The optical-to-infrared colours are consistent with the range expected from synthetic galaxy spectra, although there are some cases of very red nuclei. Our data show no evidence for evolution of the $K$-band luminosity function at $z<0.5$, and the results are well described by a Schechter function with $M_K^*=-22.75\pm0.13+5\log_{10}h$ and $ϕ^*=0.026\pm0.003 h^3 {\rm Mpc^{-3}}$. This is a somewhat higher normalization than has been found by previous workers, and it removes much of the excess in faint $K$ and $B$ counts with respect to a no-evolution model. However, we do find evidence for evolution at $z>0.5$: $M_K^*$ is approximately 0.75 mag. brighter at $z=1$. This luminosity evolution is balanced by a reduced normalization at high redshift. The overall evolution is thus opposite to that expected in simple merger-dominated models.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.