Paper detail

An identity for the coefficients of characteristic polynomials of hyperplane arrangements

Consider a finite collection of affine hyperplanes in $\mathbb R^d$. The hyperplanes dissect $\mathbb R^d$ into finitely many polyhedral chambers. For a point $x\in \mathbb R^d$ and a chamber $P$ the metric projection of $x$ onto $P$ is the unique point $y\in P$ minimizing the Euclidean distance to $x$. The metric projection is contained in the relative interior of a uniquely defined face of $P$ whose dimension is denoted by $\text{dim}(x,P)$. We prove that for every given $k\in \{0,\ldots, d\}$, the number of chambers $P$ for which $\text{dim}(x,P) = k$ does not depend on the choice of $x$, with an exception of some Lebesgue null set. Moreover, this number is equal to the absolute value of the $k$-th coefficient of the characteristic polynomial of the hyperplane arrangement. In a special case of reflection arrangements, this proves a conjecture of Drton and Klivans [A geometric interpretation of the characteristic polynomial of reflection arrangements, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 138(8): 2873-2887, 2010].

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.