Paper detail

An HST/WFC3 view of stellar populations on the Horizontal Branch of NGC 2419

We use images acquired with the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 and new models to probe the Horizontal Branch (HB) population of the We use images acquired with the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 and new models to probe the horizontal branch (HB) population of the Galactic globular cluster (GC) NGC 2419. A detailed analysis of the composite HB highlights three populations:(1) the blue luminous HB, hosting standard helium stars (Y=0.25) with a very small spread of mass, (2) a small population of stars with intermediate helium content (0.26<Y<=0.29), and (3) the well-populated extreme HB. We can fit the last group with models having high helium abundance (Y \sim 0.36), half of which (the hottest part, 'blue hook' stars) are identified as possible 'late flash mixed stars'. The initial helium abundance of this extreme population is in nice agreement with the predicted helium abundance in the ejecta of massive asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars of the same metallicity as NGC 2419. This result further supports the hypothesis that second-generation stars in GCs formed from the ashes of intermediate-mass AGB stars. We find that the distribution in magnitude of the blue hook stars is larger than that predicted by theoretical models. We discuss the possible uncertainties in the magnitude scales and different attempts to model this group of stars. Finally, we suggest that consistency can be better achieved if we assume core masses larger than predicted by our models. This may be possible if the progenitors were fast rotators on the main sequence. If further study confirms this interpretation, a fast initial rotation would be a strong signature of the peculiarity of extreme second-generation stars in GCs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.