Paper detail

An HST/COS Survey of the Low-Redshift IGM. I. Survey, Methodology, & Overall Results

We use high-quality, medium-resolution {\it Hubble Space Telescope}/Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (\HST/COS) observations of 82 UV-bright AGN at redshifts $z_{AGN}<0.85$ to construct the largest survey of the low-redshift intergalactic medium (IGM) to date: 5343 individual extragalactic absorption lines in HI and 25 different metal-ion species grouped into 2610 distinct redshift systems at $z_{abs}<0.75$ covering total redshift pathlengths $Δz_{HI}=21.7$ and $Δz_{OVI}=14.5$. Our semi-automated line-finding and measurement technique renders the catalog as objectively-defined as possible. The cumulative column-density distribution of HI systems can be parametrized $dN(>N)/dz=C_{14}(N/10^{14} cm^{-2})^{-(β-1)}$, with $C_{14}=25\pm1$ and $β=1.65\pm0.02$. This distribution is seen to evolve both in amplitude, $C_{14}\sim(1+z)^{2.0\pm0.1}$, and slope $β(z)=1.73-0.26 z$ for $z<0.47$. We observe metal lines in 427 systems, and find that the fraction of IGM absorbers detected in metals is strongly dependent on N_{HI}. The distribution of OVI absorbers appear to evolve in the same sense as the Lya forest. We calculate contributions to $Ω_b$ from different components of the low-$z$ IGM and determine the Lya decrement as a function of redshift. IGM absorbers are analyzed via a two-point correlation function (TPCF) in velocity space. We find substantial clustering of \HI\ absorbers on scales of $Δv=50-300$ km/s with no significant clustering at $Δv>1000$ km/s. Splitting the sample into strong and weak absorbers, we see that most of the clustering occurs in strong, $N_{HI}>10^{13.5} cm^{-2}$, metal-bearing IGM systems. The full catalog of absorption lines and fully-reduced spectra is available via MAST as a high-level science product at http://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/igm/.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.