Paper detail

An Extremely Red Nucleus in an Absorbed QSO at z=0.65

The results of K-band-imaging observations of a candidate of an absorbed QSO at z=0.653, AX J131831+3341, are presented. The B-K color of the object is 4.85 mag, which is much redder than optically-selected QSOs. The K-band image shows nuclear and extended components, the same as in the optical V-, R-, and I-band images. The nuclear component (I-K = 4.29 mag) is much redder than the power-law models with energy indices of 0 to -1.0, which well reproduce the V-R and R-I optical colors of the nuclear component. A heavily absorbed (A_V = 3 mag) nucleus may emerge in the K-band, while optical light may originate from scattered nuclear light. The I-K color of the extended component is 2.2 mag, which is consistent with the post-starburst nature of the host galaxy, which is also suggested from the V-R and R-I colors of the extended component.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.