An extended size-luminosity relation for the reverberation-mapped AGNs: the role of the accretion rate

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Abstract

For a compiled sample of 120 reverberation-mapped AGNs, the bivariate correlations of the broad-line regions (BLRs) size (RBLRR_{\rm BLR}) with the continuum luminosity at 5100 Å (L5100L_{5100}) and the dimensionless accretion rates (M˙\dot{\mathscr{M}}) are investigated. Using our recently calibrated virial factor ff, and the velocity tracer from the Hββ Full-width at half-maximum (FWHM(Hββ)) or the line dispersion (σHβσ_{\rm Hβ}) measured in the mean spectra, three kinds of SMBH masses and M˙\dot{\mathscr{M}} are calculated. An extended \RL relation including M˙\dot{\mathscr{M}} is found to be stronger than the canonical RBLR(Hβ)−L5100R_{\rm BLR}({\rm Hβ}) - L_{\rm 5100} relation, showing smaller scatters. The observational parameters, RFeR_{\rm Fe} (the ratio of optical Fe II to Hββ line flux) and the line profile parameter DHβD_{\rm Hβ} (DHβ=FWHM(Hβ)/σHβD_{\rm Hβ}=\rm FWHM(Hβ)/σ_{\rm Hβ}), have relations with three kinds of M˙\dot{\mathscr{M}}. Using RFeR_{\rm Fe} and DHβD_{\rm Hβ} to substitute M˙\dot{\mathscr{M}}, extended empirical RBLR(Hβ)−L5100R_{\rm BLR}({\rm Hβ}) - L_{\rm 5100} relations are presented. RFeR_{\rm Fe} is a better "fix" for the RBLR(Hβ)−L5100R_{\rm BLR}({\rm Hβ}) - L_{\rm 5100} offset than the Hββ shape DHβD_{\rm Hβ}. The extended empirical RBLR(Hβ)−L5100R_{\rm BLR}({\rm Hβ}) - L_{\rm 5100} relation including RFeR_{\rm Fe} can be used to calculate RBLRR_{\rm BLR}, and thus the single-epoch SMBH mass MBHM_{\rm BH}. Our measured accretion rate dependence is not consistent with the simple model of the accretion disk instability leading the BLRs formation. The BLR may instead form from the inner edge of the torus, or from some other means in which BLR size is positively correlated with accretion rate and the SMBH mass.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.